This is an excellent, MUST READ article from the Telegraph.
Francois Hollande: France will not help David Cameron with EU reforms – Telegraph.
Of course, in my view, reform of the EU needs to start first and foremost with the greatest anachronism, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which strongly favors France and is a post WWII masterpiece in bureaucratic inefficiency on a massive scale.
However, I agree with the French view that David Cameron may try to be just a little bit too smart.
Given David Cameron’s record in office, should we worry about his poker playing skills as a statesman?
Percentage of EU farmland by country (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Any thoughts?
Related articles
Dr Alf's Blog 
Pingback: David Cameron and Sun Tzu’s Art of War – John Gelmini « Dr Alf's Blog
David Cameron is good at making speeches and grandstanding but one only has to look at his negotiating skills to see that 90% of the time he loses and others ranging from the Chinese to Angela Merkel, run rings round him.
Tony Blair and Sir John Major, for all their faults, were much better at this sort of thing but I’m afraid that David Cameron is simply not in the same league when it comes to horsetrading and political skulduggery.
What Cameron does is make grand announcements about what the EU or whoever needs to be doing, tries to negotiate, comes away with nothing but a bloody nose and then makes another speech pretending that he has achieved something.
He tries to talk tough to experienced operators, like Vladimir Putin and Lavrov, when he lacks the military and other means to back up his rhetoric, and then wonders why they treat him with contempt as they have done on the matter of Syria where Assad looks more in power than ever.
The world is a tough and dangerous place, where one has to be prepared to back words with deeds, or as Sun Tzu would put it “know how to win without fighting”.
David Cameron does not know how to win or how to fight because his life has been one of inherited wealth, privilege and being given things on a plate.
He said that he wanted to be Prime Minister because he thought “I would be rather good at it”. Sadly, he is not in the same league as Margaret Thatcher, who knew how to negotiate or that great Edwardian gentleman, Harold MacMillan, who although he was a grandee, understood ordinary people through his experience of commanding them and fighting with them in World War 1.
People who you negotiate with look at who you are, where you have come from, and the strength of the hand you hold. They prepare, they look you in the eye, get your measure, and if they see you are unprepared and “winging it”, they will in the words of “the Donald”, “Eat your lunch” and regard you as the Chinese regard many Western leaders as “Children playing in a sandpit”.
They look at David Cameron, as I and others do, and sadly find him wanting.