Obama to halt attack if Syria destroys chemical weapons – FT.com

This is a MUST READ story from the FT. Check it out!

Obama to halt attack if Syria destroys chemical weapons – FT.com.

Clearly, President Obama will struggle to gain approval from Congress for his plan to punish Syria for deploying chemical weapons, so this Russian initiative will be attractive.

Personally, I agree with Senator McCain who said that “Congress should vote for air strikes in order to “give the president additional leverage to press Russia and Syria to make good on their proposal”.

Let me turn this to an open question:

Should President Obama the Congressional vote on Syria?

English: John McCain official photo portrait.

English: John McCain official photo portrait. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Any thoughts?

Enhanced by Zemanta

11 responses

  1. Pingback: The lesson from Summers’ exit – editorial – FT.com « Dr Alf's Blog

  2. Pingback: I disagree with Senator McCain on US policy on Syria – John Gelmini « Dr Alf's Blog

  3. Senator McCain has been in favour of every war that America has been involved in since he was shot down as an air-force pilot over Vietnam and imprisoned in the Hanoi Hilton for 5 years.

    Syria will not destroy its chemical weapons and has every incentive to hang onto them if America is going to order cruise missile strikes anyway. Giving these chemical weapons up does not strengthen Assad’s hand; it weakens it because by keeping them, he has a card to play and in the event of a Western attack some of the stockpiles could be hit causing death through chemical weapons unintentionally.

    The Pentagon knew years ago that they would need at least 75,000 troops to invade Syria and has already planned for that eventuality as other troops from Turkey and France would make up the balance of the invasion force.

    Matters will not end with cruise missile strikes and Assad,brutal dictator that he is,has a right to defend his country from outside attack.

    If the West kills him and all his followers it then means it has to find a strong leader to replace him who is our puppet and will crush the Al Qaeda related elements such as Al Nusra who are our sworn enemies and who wish to create a Caliphate across the entire world controlled by Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
    Russia does not want to lose the Port of Tartus and cannot be seen to back down easily.

    Air strikes against Syria will not make them more compliant as Senator McCain seems to think,but it will make them angry and give them an incentive to create trouble for us at a later stage.It will lead to a much wider Middle East war, casualties on a much larger scale than the chemical attack at Gouta, higher oil prices,Europe and America tipped back into recession and the advancement of Wahibi style Islamic terrorism to our detriment.

    China, similarly will not forget and will in its own time, which could be decades later, make the West pay.

    One of their Generals put it this way”We nurse our sense of grievance and wait”.

    Unlike Dr Alf with whom I usually agree, I think that we should mind our own business and attend to our own problems.

    This because as General Martin Dempsey, America’s top general said before he was leant on,”Attacking Syria leaves us with no good options and is not in America,s best interests”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: