George Osborne and tax evasion what’s trending? via Storify

Image representing Twitter as depicted in Crun...

Image via CrunchBase

This morning I spotted that UK Chancellor, George Osborne was crowing about his record on tax evasion on his Twitter micro blog. This prompted me to use Storify to identify what was trending on George Osborne and tax evasion. Check it out below?

Looking at the Storify cited articles, there was not too much coverage from the mainstream media. Also there was not too much focus on the strategy, plan or potential windfall from tackling tax evasion.

This prompts me to offer a related open question:

Why are George Osborne and the HMRC not publishing a strategy, plan and quantifying the potential windfall from effectively tackling tax evasion of the wealthy and the multi-nationals?

Any thoughts?

Enhanced by Zemanta

4 responses

  1. Pingback: Has George Osborne got the bottle for cuts? – Andrew Haldenby – Telegraph « Dr Alf's Blog

  2. Pingback: George Osborn: Possible Silver Bullet Options? « Dr Alf's Blog

  3. The answer to Dr Alf’s perfectly reasonable question is because George Osborne has large numbers of friends engaged in paying as little tax as possible and because he knows that if he starts to tackle tax evasion by multinationals(practically all of them), they will re-base themselves in more tax efficient locations as Sir Richard Branson, Sir Ralph Halpern, Sir Philip Green, David Coulthard, the former racing driver, Glaxo Smith Kline, the Barclay Brothers, Lord Vestey, Union International Group, Hanson Trust and most of the top media groups have already done.

    State Street, the American company tasked by the Government to manage the funds in Stakeholder Pensions under “Auto Enrollment”, are based in the Dublin Financial District as are HSBC, BT PLC, Facebook, Linked In, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Mandiant and a host of British and American companies who “book sales” in Eire rather than the UK.

    I have seen the buildings myself, earlier in the Summer, during a short Citybreak yet the Government did nothing because they knew that these companies had been secretly promised just 3% Corporation Tax by the Irish Government.

    HMRC does nothing because they lack the trained staff capable of out-thinking Big 4 accountancy practices and because they themselves use offshore special purpose vehicles devised by PWC and KPMG for their own buildings (See Private Eye editions and Google Mapeley Steps in Bermuda).

    Then, there is the revolving door between the Big 4 and HMRC, whereby on one day a Big 4 partner will be devising aggressive tax avoidance schemes and on another he or she is working for HMRC as a poacher turned gamekeeper.

    Whilst they “game-keep” to close down the first set of schemes, their colleagues devise many more new ones in such quantity that HMRC could never keep up.

    It is the civilianized version of Krupp and Sir Basil Zaharoff working to produce armor piercing shells to a South American dictatorship on one day, and then selling tough armor plate to the rivals of those countries for use on battleships.

    The system works in reverse as people like Dave Harnett the former CEO of the HMRC advise multinationals on tax avoidance.

    Whilst working for HMRC before this, he let Vodaphone off a £6 billion gbp tax bill against the legal advice of HMRC’s lawyers and refused to talk about this and companies like Eon who have not paid any Corporation Tax for the past 8 years according to Margaret Hodge at the Public Accounts Committee.

    For the super wealthy and large multinationals, tax is optional and unless you get Global Governance, a single currency for the whole world and global tax enforcement it will always be like that despite all the huffing,puffing and mock indignation by politicians.

    The late Leona Helmsley put it best “Little people pay taxes”.

  4. In particular, the rich in comparison to the less fortunate are made less fortunate, precisely because they are unable to avoid tax, that those who have high income who take advantage and are in a position to pay specialists who specialize in tax scams or tax avoidance.
    The other consideration is, if the government is losing the confidence of the people as should be the case in Britain as a realistic appraisal of government or miss government, as many consider this to be the case, it is the duty of all members of this society, to diminish tax payable to government as a gesture of ones discontent with managerial incompetence, that is with a government that has lost focus on being able to have a worth while vision of the future.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: