Corporate settlements in the United States: The criminalisation of American business | The Economist

Corruption Perceptions Index 2006

Corruption Perceptions Index 2006 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

This is an excellent, timely and controversial lead article from the Economist. Check it out!

via Corporate settlements in the United States: The criminalisation of American business | The Economist.

Personally, I struggle that the Economist is trying to defend big business from wrong-doing. The power of big-business is enormous. Big-business typically do not pay their share of taxes like ordinary folks. Greed drives big business. Big business does not want Keynesian economic stimulus  – they’re alright – the working classes and middle classes can bury themselves.

Yes, the regulatory authorities have enormous power and they are securing eye-watering fines. Fear is a deterrent. Bring it on!

I do not believe that the answer is to curtail the regulatory powers. Perhaps, the answer is a special oversight committee of the regulators?

Once again, we are back to strategy. Governments and political parties, must have a clear strategy in dealing with big business. See my blog entitled Abuse of Strategy and John Gelmini’s excellent response which I reblogged.


One response

  1. Dr Alf is right, the Economist is the defender of the indefensible.

    This, in that it acts for the bankers,”masters of the universe” and those above them who created the banking and financial crisis and oversaw the removal of several trillions from the global financial system which were then laundered through 40 different tax havens and literally doubled the nett worth of a tiny plutocracy overnight.

    We can see who some of these people are because of the real property and investments they have made but many still remain hidden because they have invested in gold,rare gems,fine art or even their own offshore banks.

    In America many of these people have been caught,tried ,found guilty and imprisoned but even there the really big fish are still at large.

    Here the latter day “Robber Barons” walk about with impunity like the fiddling MP,s,junketing BBC,NHS and quangocracy executives who get paid more money than ever for wasting taxpayers money along with top civil service Mandarins who are given performance bonuses for poor procurement at the MOD.

    When the infrastructure company which used to run the London Underground imploded leaving losses of 0.5 billion gbp,the directors were not pursued for wrongful trading or surcharged let alone investigated during the time of Gordon Brown who was then the Prime Minister.

    The “Longbridge 4” are now living in France courtesey of the taxpayer and are £44 million gbp wealthier.

    They too cannot be touched for legal reasons.

    The directors of Equitable Life whose salespeople were involved in misselling

    There are many other cases like this but to the Economist wealth no matter how it is obtained somehow makes everything fine and as long as no court has convicted someone(they hardly ever do),then everything is fine.

    The rule seems to be become a fat cat,fail,steal as much as possible,use a reputation management agency to clean up your image,bank your ill gotten gains,reinvest them into things that make you even more money,acquire more mistresses and live happily ever after.

    The rules for everyone else get progressively harder until you become the lowest of the low ,a benefit recipient.

    If you are one of those in my county(Hertfordshire) and you live within the area covered by North Herts District Council,you can expect to be pursued relentlessly if you owe more than £2000 gbp and you can expect to lose your council home and be tried,convicted and imprisoned.

    If you are single and have come back from fighting in Afghanistan or are homeless you will be lucky if you are housed or rehoused even if you are maimed and have lost limbs and you may have to go to the newspapers to get any help at all.

    The concept of equal treatment under the law has been a joke in this country for some time yet publications like the Economist want to ingratiate themselves with plutocrats at the expense of everyone else.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: