Location of Scotland in the UK and Europe, on terrain map showing surface and underwater contour areas. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

This is a MUST-READ lead article in the Economist. Check it out!

via Scottish independence: UK RIP? | The Economist.

For me, the Economist makes a powerful argument for Scotland to continue to stay as part of the UK; this is in Scotland’s best interests and those of the UK.

The Scottish independence debate has assured Scotland she will receive constructively the same same reforms as part of the UK. Scotland has shown the UK that Westminster must be reformed in the interests of the whole of the UK. It’s time to devolve power. The political classes of Westminster need downsizing and some of their own austerity medicine.

Voting “No” to independence will give Scotland the same as “Yes” but without the catastrophic risks and certain pain of a “Yes” vote.

Please vote “No” and give Scotland a greater say in the UK!

Thoughts?

Related articles

• Scottish Independence: Edinburgh ‘would flourish’
• Scottish independence: What happens if Scotland votes yes?
• Scottish referendum: ‘Don’t vote for independence to give the effing Tories a kick’ David Cameron tells Scotland
• Scotland – Yes or No to protect the NHS?
• Scottish Referendum: What Is the United Kingdom?
• Ten days to save the Union with Scotland
• Scottish independence referendum: ‘Better Together’s promises for “no” vote are unfair to Wales and England’
• R.I.P. GB: what will happen if Scotland votes Yes in the independence referendum?