Forward, comrades! | The Economist

Ed Milliband MP speaking at the Labour Party c...

Ed Milliband MP speaking at the Labour Party conference. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

With the UK’s Labour Party lurching to the left, this article in the Economist is a must-read. Check it out!

via Forward, comrades! | The Economist.

The Labour Party were thoroughly humiliated at the last UK general election. Ed Miliband, the leader resigned and now there is a new leadership contest. As the Economist highlights, the candidates are all afraid to highlight why Labour did so badly. With the backing of the unions, it looks like Labour is returning to its socialist roots – the Economist argues this will precipitate years in the political wilderness.

I’m not a Labour Party supporter and never have been. But an effective Labour Party has  been traditionally

important to UK politics to hold the Conservatives properly to account.

Surely, Labour’s lurch for the left will precipitate further fragmentation and weakening of UK politics?

Thoughts?

One response

  1. Dr Alf is right to be worried about the Labour party’s inability to get it’s act together and hold the Conservative Party to account.

    They claim to “need to understand why they were defeated” and are in denial.

    The answer is first to understand the truth and then change.

    As with Elizabeth Kubler Ross and her 8 stages of bereavement and 7 stages of divorce, the Labour party are stuck in the first stage (Denial) which is like a widow, widower or parent not acknowledging that their spouse or child is dead.

    The Trades Unions and the BBC and left-wing “intelligentsia” are at stage 2 (Anger), which is why they are blaming the public for “not getting the message” and the “right wing press”.

    The BBC are co-opting “luvvies” and people like Sir David Attenborough to write letters to try and persuade the Government to back down on BBC reform, which is long overdue given the poll tax like nature of the licence fee and the accompanying gravy-train, whereby ex-Labour ministers, like James Purnell get paid 295000 gbp a year for doing virtually nothing.

    Labour needs to ask voters in large numbers why they voted as they did and then develop policies to meet those concerns and those of equal importance which the Government is not addressing.

    A start would be severing links with trades unions and confronting the medical profession and local authority Chief Executives, rather than banging on about cuts to services.

    Actually answering questions would be a good idea for all politicians but not saying anything about what they would do about policies they claim to dislike is not credible.

    Nor is it credible for them to be against cuts yet demand no cuts in public services.

    We do not need 43 English constabularies, fire commands and county councils, nor do we need district and borough councils, unitary authorities, city councils and mid county councils, London and Metropolitan Borough Councils, yet all we hear from Corbyn, Burnham, Kendall, Cooper and the weak Umana is talk of “savage cuts”.

    Clearly, the Labour party needs to wake up but as yet their self-induced torpor has descended upon them and paralyzed their brains.

    As George Osborne surmises, they have for now become a petulant irrelevance incapable of articulating a credible position on anything let alone being an opposition.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: