China has been intensively developing homegrown VTOL fighter jet, but admits it lags behind America

China has been intensively developing homegrown VTOL fighter jet, but admits it lags behind America

This is a popular story from China Daily Mail. It’s well worth a read. Check it out!

As I dwelled on the implications, my mind switched to Europe and absence of an effective defense strategy. In particular, I am still angered by thought of UK defense cuts in the name of austerity. Surely defense spending should be ring-fenced rather than foreign-aid which often ends up in the hands of corrupt officials?

Thoughts?

China News

Model of Chian’s Type 081 amphibious attack warship Model of Chian’s Type 081 amphibious attack warship

The following is based on translations from reports on Chinese websites:

Chinese website mil.huanqiu.com describes in its report the difficulties in developing a VTOLfighter jet but concludes that for China at present, development of a VTOL fighter jet within a short period time is not a simple task.

Though China has started the project for such a fighter jet, Chinese military industrial workers still have a long way to go to fulfil that arduous task.

Another Chinese media of similar status, xinhuanet.com, describes in its report the following shortcomings of a VTOL fighter jet: 1. larger fuel consumption; 2. smaller load of ammunition; 3. difficulties to produce and operate; 4. relatively high requirements for takeoff and landing environment (sand, soil taken into engine may cause serious problems); and 5. longer duration of maintenance.

However, xinhua says that China still wants…

View original post 464 more words

One response

  1. Dr Alf is right to be worried about UK defence cuts, which mean that our Tri-Forces are effectively like the Papal Guard, with aircraft carriers with no aircraft, no fighting and storming robots, no space based weapons, not enough manpower and not even a coastal protection vessel to guard our coast.
    The China Daily Mail article should be taken with a pinch of salt because the Chinese are very secretive and often deliberately understate their capabilities and force numbers.

    For example, they supposedly have 4 million cyber-warriors compared to America’s 1 million or so, Russia’s 2 million and GCHQ’s 12,000 (based on the size of the car park and transport facilities in Cheltenham, Bude etc and which includes contractors and embedded NSA personnel).

    All these figures are in the public domain, (so no treasonable Edward Snowden type revelations here!)

    In fact when cyber warfare units in the People’s Liberation Army(PLA) are factored in the true figure could be up to 1 million more for a total of 5 million.

    On top of that, Chinese students studying overseas are required to keep notebooks and record “soft fact impressions” in their interactions with people in the host country where they are studying and their fellow students who will presumably join the Governing elites of their countries when they are older.

    Thus following the principle of “If I know what I know plus what you know I have an advantage over you”, the Chinese are methodically working out how everyone thinks so that they can, as” the Donald ” puts it ,”Eat everyone’s lunch”.

    The same goes for nuclear weapons, many of which the PLA stores in underground bunkers underneath the Great Wall of China and with the very secret weather warfare facility the PLA has in a remote part of the Gobi desert.

    In the sense that many of the more modern weapons Russia has, China never gets the latest versions but they patiently re-engineer what they do have, so whatever gaps exist are steadily being closed.
    America has the most advanced fighting robots, killer satellites, weather warfare capability, Tesla cannon and thermobaric weapons, the most marines and the biggest carrier fleets. It also has the “Death Star ” weapon positioned in deep space just before GW Bush left office.

    That said there is no room for complacency, as China holds most American debt and is increasing defence spending in real terms by 11.5% per year even in the face of present economic turbulence.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: