Cameron’s case for Syria airstrikes is highly contentious | Politics | The Guardian

Coat of Arms of Saudi Arabia

Coat of Arms of Saudi Arabia (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The Guardian reports that there is no clear strategy, objective or endgame, with one US commander describing the campaign in Syria and Iraq as a stalemate.

Source: Cameron’s case for Syria airstrikes is highly contentious | Politics | The Guardian

Whilst the left-wing Guardian would not hesitate to embarass Cameron’s government, the issue about absence of a cohesive strategy seems sound. Of course, the American General is embarassing Obama more than Cameron.

Surely, the Guardian should be directing its questioning to Obama’s policies first and foremost? Also whilst they’re questioning, perhaps they should look at Saudi Arabia & the Gulf states for their role?

Thoughts?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: