Opinion – The Guardian view on UK national priorities: flood defence and overseas aid are not alternatives | Editorial | Opinion | The Guardian

This Guardian editorial argues that rightwing press attempts to pit the aid budget against the need to defend Britain against floods are posing a false choice, since both are essential priorities.

Source: The Guardian view on UK national priorities: flood defence and overseas aid are not alternatives | Editorial | Opinion | The Guardian

The Guardian makes a compelling argument, citing right-wing critiques of foreign aid as lazy in their thinking and not looking at the evidence.

It occurs to me that this is not just about a false choice between flood defenses and foreign aid. The problem is wider and multi-dimensional – the savage cuts to the UK’s public sector have impacted front-line services first and foremost. There are similar risks in defense, healthcare and other important areas. Of course, Osborne’s bacon-slicer approach, top-slicing, has resulted in costs cuts rather than cost enduring reduction. There are still massive opportunities to remove inefficiency from the public sector – a strategy is required which addresses consolidation, technology, outsourcing and offshoring. Similarly, the service offering needs radical reform too, for example, this needs to replace the UK’s public health service with a best practice model. Even with an effective strategy, there is another important area of weakness, namely strategic delivery – this typically relies upon ineffective bureaucrats and major consulting firms charging up to GBP5,000 a day. All of these areas of specialization used to be my areas of expertise before I retired overseas – the UK public sector procurement model favors cronyism and is loaded against independent expertise. The UK must address the public sector effectively before the economy can go on a sustained growth path.

George Osborne‘s principle strategy is about austerity. BUT this is for ideological reasons rather than economic analysis.

Thoughts?

Deutsch: logo der tageszeitung the guardian

Deutsch: logo der tageszeitung the guardian (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

One response

  1. Unlike Dr Alf and in this instance the Guardian, I see no “savage cuts” to public services, just the illusion that it is happening.

    We have 43, English County Councils, 8 Scottish ones, 6 in Wales and 6 in Northern Ireland plus Unitary Authorities, Metropolitan Borough Councils and Districts, Boroughs and Mid County Councils, City Councils and the 6 London Boroughs. In all, there are 3,500 councils with tax collecting powers and worker productivity in all of them averages just 32%. Purchasing and supply chain management are, for the most part, useless and Council Chiefs pay themselves huge salaries irrespective of performance.

    The NHS employs more people than anyone else in Europe, surpassed in size by only the Indian State Railway System and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. Yet despite this, it delivers worse health care outcomes than any other Western European country outside of Greece.

    The Police are bloated and inefficient, fail to identify suspects in 50% of cases, deliberately under report crime and according to no lesser a person than Lord Stevens of Kirkwhelpington, a former Metropolitan Police Commissioner,”The police have been fiddling figures for years.”

    Flood defences have proved inadequate because money that should have been spent on roads, bridges and infrastructure has not been and there has been no full and forensic accounting to establish what money was sent to these local authorities, what they spent and what the money bought. As with the Somerset levels last year we now discover that the Environment Agency has not been dredging rivers or building up Embankments in preparation for anything but has been relying on Met Office forecasts even though it knew that Tesco PLC and the BBC have fired them for delivering woefully inaccurate weather forecasts. It has over the years been allowing the building to take place on flood plains but has also failed to endorse or encourage ICF/Systems building which would have allowed building on flood plains without the risks of flooding associated with conventional construction.

    Far from “savage cuts” we are getting deck chairs rearranged on the Titanic with no meaningful reform.
    Money spent on State Aid is separate from these issues and merits a separate discussion and action.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: