Opinion – Theresa May’s authority slips as she bores Britain with empty answers | Owen Jones | Opinion | The Guardian – John Gelmini

Dr Alf brings us an unusually good piece from the Guardian and as much as Owen Jones is unpleasant and supercilious to me, his article hits home.

May, raised in more genteel times is not a fan of plain language which means that people of modest or low intelligence do not understand her but even the stupidest understand that “difficult choices” means getting less or paying a lot more.

They see that fat cat bosses who export nothing, sell nothing, deliver nothing and pay little are not dealt with as promised but that the “difficult choices” will be made by “little people” just like them.

On obesity, malingering, hypochondria and NHS management layering, May could have said and done something when she came into office.

With the junior doctors who were striking about overtime, swift action to fire them and replace them, Ronald Reagan style, en mass and clear out useless NHS managers would have marked her out as a no-nonsense Prime Minister but instead matters were allowed to drag out.

Talk of banning strikes in essential public services has proved to be so much hot air as has helping the “Just about managing”.

What we get are soundbites scripted by a wily Antipodesian Sir Lynton Crosby, which are designed to “Not frighten the sheep”.

People once upon a time would listen to a politician talking rubbish but agree with him/her because they spoke with the right accent or were considered honourable.

Those days have long gone because with the internet people can compare each statement with what has actually been started,the progress made to date and the end result.

May is said to carefully prepare for everything but preparing for negotiations, boxing matches or anything else is not enough.

What matters is your ability to follow through and effect demonstrable progress.
May fails to prepare because as Dr Alf points out, neither she nor her Ministers ever cost or risk assess anything which is why there are so many U Turns.

I say she fails to think ahead and future proof which means she is focussed always on the present where smart opponents can see her telegraphed moves and counter them.
In battle this represents the route to early defeat for a country it means negotiations in which we lose before we have even begun.

Mrs May at 62 is probably rather too set in her ways but she would do well to learn about OODA LOOP and read the book entitled a “Discourse on Winning and Losing” by Lt Colonel John Boyd who developed the concept having read the Art of War by Sun Tzu,The Book of Five Rings by Myamoto Mushashi and then applied it in the Korean and Vietnam Wars.

The initial O stands for observe with that observation giving you a clear view of your opponent ideally without you doing the same in reverse. The second O stands for orient where you see the lie of the land in relation to your respective positions and position yourself to take advantage of your opponent without him realising what you are going to do next.Ideally you have 2 or 3 alternatives up your sleeve ready to be deployed.

This brings us to the D which stands for deploy which is the equivalent of “locking on” to your target if you are Boyd but the equivalent of having your arguments marshalled but secret if you are a politician like May.

Margaret Thatcher in her prime used to deploy facts in this way so very few people ever caught her flat-footed or delivering a platitudinous answer.

The A represents act.

Action should of course be swift, powerful and hard to counter.

Mrs May fails to do any of this, her Ministers are even worse and to make matters worse she does not understand “going the distance” or “getting up from the mat”,both concepts from boxing.

May thinks that by wearing the right clothes, speaking in a slightly preachy tone and giving boring answers she will bore people into voting for her.

Owen Jones has shown us that this may well be her undoing and his assessment is correct.

John Gelmini

What’s gone wrong with the Conservative campaign? George Eaton – New Statesman

Here’s an excellent analysis from George Eaton, the political editor at the New Statesman. He argues that Theresa May‘s weaknesses and a lack of popular policies have driven the Tories backwards.

What’s gone wrong with the Conservative campaign?

Yesterday I arrived in London and talking about the general election over dinner with a number of natural Tory voters, the conclusion was that Theresa May had screwed up big time and the risk of a hung parliament or indeed a Corbyn coalition was more likely.

Many natural conservatives don’t want to vote for Theresa May but they do want a Conservative majority. Perhaps, a small majority would be best, so that May is held to account, and surgically removed in a coup if she’s still weak and wobbly. Surely, the UK can’t afford a weak and wobbly PM negotiating Brexit?