Opinion – High-rise blocks like Grenfell Tower can be safe. The key issue is management | Anna Minton | Opinion | The Guardian

English: Social housing on approach to London ...

English: Social housing on approach to London Bridge Station SE1 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Following tragic loss of life in Greenfell Tower fire, Anna Minton in a hard-hitting op-ed in the Guardian takes a hard-look at Britain’s social housing. Critically, it highlights that residents of the gutted building in west London have been warning for years that a tragedy was inevitable.

Source: High-rise blocks like Grenfell Tower can be safe. The key issue is management | Anna Minton | Opinion | The Guardian

Straight after the general election where the excessive austerity of the Conservative Party played to Labour’s advantage, this article reminds us of two important factors:

  • UK is a divided society where home ownership is increasingly hard for young people and more people are looking towards a life in social housing
  • Ineffective administration of social housing

As Britain sails towards the economic rocks on Brexit, there is no escape from the housing crisis. For the young without wealthy parents, it’s hard to get on the housing ladder. For others, social housing offers a life in dangerously poor quality homes where acute social problems abound.

Earlier in my career, I was an expert advisor in effective cost management of public sector estates. Sadly, the whole system is a failure through a property’s life cycle, ranging from design, build, maintenance, decommissioning and destruction. Where services are outsourced, there are acute weaknesses in delivering value for money. Allocation of social housing is closely tied to raging debate about the effectiveness of public welfare – we are also reminded that immigration is part of the problem.

Yesterday, Theresa May suspended announcing her political agreement with the DUP out of respect for London latest crisis but many are again questioning the effectiveness of government policy – this time on social housing. Unfortunately, with a weak and wobbly leader in power, we are reminded that it will be firefighting rather vision and strategy that will lead the way. This is yet another vivid reminder why Theresa May has to go and quickly.

Thoughts?

 

 

One response

  1. I share Dr Alf’s concerns and some of what is outlined in this Guardian article but there is much more to consider.

    The old tower blocks put up in the 1950’s and 1960’s were eyesores but they did the job of housing poor people who had been bombed out by Hitler’s Luftwaffe.

    They were however very cold in winter to the point where every winter pensioners would be discovered weeks later dead from hypothermia because the choice between eating or paying electricity bills presented too stark a choice.

    Cladding to make the buildings less of an eyesore and more energy efficient was the response but much of this cladding contained inflammable materials and all this was happening at the same time as fire regulations were being relaxed.

    The “Fire Futures” report was one example of this but in this building and others like it there were no sprinkler systems and the Fire Brigade lacks appliances that can deliver water or firefighting chemicals above the 10th floor.

    The approach to proper risk management is a typically British one of write a report,do nothing and hope for the best.

    The outsourcing company responsible for looking after these buildings has had no trouble in paying its directors very well but seems loathe to spend on social housing of this kind.

    Then there is the unwritten policy of decanting the poor,the dispossessed and Housing Benefit recipients out of London and into places like Luton and the far North.

    Part of that policy is gentrification of areas to encourage wealthy inward investors but part of it is spending as little as possible on the housing needs of the poor in the hope that they leave the area or die off.

    In a normal household where people have jobs houses are frequently empty all day long or throughout school hours if young offspring live there.

    This fire ,the causes of which are as yet unknown grew with unseemly haste to engulf its inhabitants.
    One might expect higher fire safety standards because of the risks but no,the same low standards of fire safety were applied to these people that were worse than those applied to skyscrapers in Docklands where yuppies live.

    Doubtless there will be an inquiry,we will hear about lessons learnt and “robust”processes and then no-one will be held accountable and the whole matter quietly forgotten.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: