HSBC’s Assaf Says More London Jobs May Stay on Softer Brexit – Bloomberg

 

Bloomberg reports that HSBC Holdings Plc’s investment bank chief Samir Assaf said a hard Brexit is now unlikely after the U.K. election, and that could mean more jobs staying in London.

Source: HSBC’s Assaf Says More London Jobs May Stay on Softer Brexit – Bloomberg

Since Theresa May’s disastrous election, business leaders and economic experts have been piling in, arguing the case for a soft Brexit. So far, only a brave few have addressed the real elephant in the room that ‘No Brexit’ is economically far better than a ‘Soft Brexit’. But it’s not fashionable to talk of ‘No Brexit’ after the referendum. However, it’s possible that there could be a pendulum swing back to Remain with a major national event.

Another thought, perhaps the UK people might remember that Boris Johnson told a few porkies in his Brexit case and that might tarnish his political image, trying to become the next leader of the Conservative Party? . After all, the cards have come crashing down since the Brexit referendum, haven’t they?

Thoughts?

Opinion – Op-Ed: Chaotic Washington is not a shining example of democracy – People’s Daily Online

English: Logo of the People's Daily 中文: 人民日报题字

English: Logo of the People’s Daily 中文: 人民日报题字 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

In a powerful op-ed, here’s the most-read article in China‘s influential People’s Daily. It explores the question, ‘Is the US still a model of democracy?’. It suggests that that question, previously a far-fetched idea for many, is being asked more and more. Critically, it explores the realization that Western democracy—even American democracy—can fall into chaos and undermine the international community’s goal of peace and development.

Source: Op-Ed: Chaotic Washington is not a shining example of democracy – People’s Daily Online

The article clearly supports China geopolitical influence and for it’s readers blurs the differences between a one-party totalitarian regime to Trump’s America – many liberal critics see Trump’s election as a step towards fascism. Of course, it’s populism and Trump, in particular, that has debased US democracy. But we are beginning to see the US political and legal system start to place some serious barriers for Trump. It’s worrying when Trump’s son-in-law, a critical advisor, is having his business interests investigated for links with Russia.

Perhaps, the US needs a Macron, who’s not tainted by association with the Washington’s political establishment?

Thoughts?