Opinion – Russia’s Fake Americans – The Editorial Board – the NYT

This an important read from the NYT. But surely it’s not that surprising? Part of the issue is that certain classes of Americans are showing themselves as naive and gullable. After all, if your main source of information is Facebook and Twitter, surely you’ve got to take responsibility for yor own stupidity?

I have five thousand plus followers on Twitter and less than a hundred whom I follow. I only follow accredited independent sources. Facebook use I keep to the minimum. With an important breaking news story, I look for the evidence and most importantly I validate information with multiple sources. Perhaps, I’m just too suspicious?

There’s an old Latin maxim, ‘Caveat Emptar’ – let the buyer beware. In an age of social media and false news, readers have a responsibility to check their sources.

Russia understands the weaknesses in American society and it was possibly considered an easy win. But by comparison, Putin is telling the Russian IT industry that it must not rely on US software and must develop it’s own products.

Of course, the NYT editorial is right. The NYT conclusion is spot-on, namely that the people need to question why Trump and Congress are not doing more about the foreign policy invasion in US democracy. Surely, it’s time to dump the populists and replace them with people power?

Thoughts?

 

 

 

 

Opinion – Managing the costs of clinical negligence in NHS trusts – National Audit Office (NAO)

Citing review of ten years data, the NAO reports that the cost of clinical negligence in NHS trusts is significant and rising fast, placing increasing financial pressure on an already stretched system.

Source: Managing the costs of clinical negligence in trusts – National Audit Office (NAO)

The key findings are:

  1. The cost of clinical negligence claims is rising at a faster rate year-on-year, than NHS funding
  2. Even if successful, NHS Resolution and the Department’s current actions are unlikely to stop the growth in the cost of clinical negligence claims
  3. The government lacks a coherent cross-government strategy, underpinned by policy, to support measures to tackle the escalation
  4. The increase in damages is driven by a small number of high-value claims, while the increase in legal costs is mainly due to a large number of low- and medium-value claims up to £250,000

For me there are probably three fundamentals which this report is too polite to identify.

Firstly, politicians have consistently meddled and provided knee jerk reactions, failing to look at the NHS crisis holistically from a strategic perspective. Rather than radically reform the public health industry, the government is too weak and introducing piecemeal outsourcing which is clearly sub-optimal.

Secondly, the NHS is ineffectively managed, relying upon a narrow group of industry specialists, rather than opening its ranks to world class talent from other sectors.

Thirdly, the various political stakeholders in the UK’s public health industry are typically putting their own interests ahead of patients. In the private sector, there’s a wealth of research confirming the market oriented businesses consistently achieve superior fanancial performance. Within the NHS, there’s a ‘one-size-fits-all’ policy to patients, treating them more as children than customers.

Thoughts?