Opinion – German Manufacturing Is Leading a Digital Industrial Revolution – Harvard Business Review – John Gelmini

Having undertaken many interim assignments in financial services over the past 21 years and worked in insurance, banking, consumer lending, mortgages, factoring, invoice discounting and within offshore fund management, wealth management and insurance broking at the sales, marketing and organisational ends, I cannot but agree with Dr Alf.

What I notice, time and again, is a short-term “Lets be having it now ” mentality whereby everything is very target driven and the marketing model is 200 years old, virtually unchanged in all of that time.

Executives within these segments tend to oversimply things and lack any real understanding of how ordinary people think and live, so they make assumptions about what will appeal to them on which they then model their sales and marketing processes and their customer services and retention processes. They seek to minimise the costs of underpinning operations but since these are supporting sales force structures fit for the 19th century, they are top-heavy with too many unnecessary processes.

They use compliance as the rationale for having too many layers of sales and call centre supervision when a flat self-determined work team structure reporting to a finance director would be more appropriate and a lot cheaper to run. Along with this structure as it is now, operations and systems are necessarily unwieldy with the appearance of leanness created by outsourcing when in fact elimination and automation would have been better choices.

The tail often “wags the dog” in that in the process of credit underwriting of loans, mortgages and business finance the chain of command of credit committees is very narrow with no “dual key” to deal with illness or absence. This creates unconscionable delays for potential clients and loses firms business as these prospects go elsewhere or look for alternatives.

At the consumer end, the so-called Mortgage Market Review and new misguided legislation on buy-to-let mortgages and the tax treatment of rental income, does nothing to increase housing supply, drives potential and actual landlords offshore, and makes the entire process intrusive, long and stressful for customers, whilst real potential excesses by investment bankers at the opposite end of the spectrum are made possible. Future “Gordon Gekko’s” and “Wolves of Wall Street” are out there ready to create future banking crises whilst regulators composed of not very bright people complicate life for ordinary members of the public and bolt stable doors long after the horse has been rendered into wood glue sold in B&Q, Homebase and Wickes.

John Gelmini

Exclusive: German firms scaling back investment in Britain ahead of EU vote | Reuters

Reuters reports that German companies are scaling back their investment in Britain ahead of its June 23 referendum on membership of the European Union, and German industry is becoming increasingly vocal in warning that a Brexit would hit both countries’ economies.

Source: Exclusive: German firms scaling back investment in Britain ahead of EU vote | Reuters

This story should be no surprise. The risks of a Brexit are real and German firms are mitigating against potential loss.

The economic evidence against Brexit is overwhelming. Meanwhile Brexit sponsors and their supporters continue in denial. The central message of the Brexiteers is xenophobia – yet it is questionable that immigration would be seriously curtailed with a Brexit; the Economist highlighted that immigrants would still be required to support UK economic growth because of the skills shortage of the indigenous population.

Thoughts?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,927 other followers