Spectacular displays of the northern lights or aurora borealis in northern Norway – Telegraph

English: This is a picture of Aurora Borealis ...

English: This is a picture of Aurora Borealis from canada. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska -- The Aurora B...

EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska — The Aurora Borealis, or Northern Lights, shines above Bear Lake. ( 64°42′N 148°30′W / °S °W / ; latd>90 (dm format) in latd latm longm : AFB east, Bear Lake west) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

English: An Aurora Borealis observed at Bossek...

English: An Aurora Borealis observed at Bossekop (Finmark, in northern Norway), on 19 January 1839. Illustration from ‘Electricity and Magnetism’ by Amedee Guillemin (1826-1893), published in London in 1891. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

Aurora during a geomagnetic storm that was mos...

Aurora during a geomagnetic storm that was most likely caused by a coronal mass ejection from the Sun on 24 May 2010. Taken from the ISS. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

Check out these fantastic photos in the Telegraph!

 

Aurora Borealis as seen from Laberg, Salangen,...

Aurora Borealis as seen from Laberg, Salangen, Troms, Norway on new years eve 2005. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

via Spectacular displays of the northern lights or aurora borealis in northern Norway – Telegraph.

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

The great green con no. 1: The hard proof that finally shows global warming forecasts that are costing you billions were WRONG all along | Mail Online

English: Graphic illustrating the percentages ...

English: Graphic illustrating the percentages of public opinions on the likelihood of some scientists falsifying global warming research. Based on Rasmussen polling of 1,000 American adults conducted July 29-30, 2011. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

For the third blog on global warming, here is an important MailOnline article, published in May 2013. It’s AN IMPORTANT READ. Check it out!

via The great green con no. 1: The hard proof that finally shows global warming forecasts that are costing you billions were WRONG all along | Mail Online.

This supplements the earlier blogs. Open the links to see the first and second articles.

Of course, there is a lot of money supporting the anti-global warming cause. This is a major political consideration because big business and its sponsors would likely lose billions if protecting the environment for future generations became a priority policy.

Any thoughts?

Enhanced by Zemanta