Vulnerable consumers in regulated industries – National Audit Office (NAO)

This is an recommended read from the UK’s National Audit Office. It suggests that regulators and government need to work together better to ensure that vulnerable consumers get the support they need.

Source: Vulnerable consumers in regulated industries – National Audit Office (NAO)

For me the scope of this article is understated. For example, what about regulation of the UK airports?

I have recently returned from the US and witnessed far higher levels of service and quality in US airports both on domestic and international flights. Take security as an example, in the US, technology permits scanning of hand-baggage without taking out laptops and toiletries. Why? Well there’s less inertia in the US and consumers are more assertive.

Also US airports are clean, functional and retail outlets offer both quality and value. Generally, customer facing staff are courteous and smiling. So why are things so different in the UK?

I question whether UK regulators are too close to commercial players, at the expense of both consumers and employees?

Thoughts?

TRUE cost of health tourism: Foreigners cost NHS up to £2BN a year | Mail Online

United Kingdom: stamp

United Kingdom: stamp (Photo credit: Sem Paradeiro)

NHS Job Shop: "Working for Health" i...

NHS Job Shop: “Working for Health” in Kentish Town. Closed. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

This is an important, MUST READ, article from the Mail Online. It’s a RECOMMENDED READ. Check it out!

TRUE cost of health tourism: Foreigners cost NHS up to £2BN a year | Mail Online.

As I read the article, my mind immediately raced to questions about the evidence under-pinning this important policy change. See my blog yesterday about evidence-based policy. Even the Mail picks up the thread after grabbing the headline with the big number.

For me, this is more UK Government meddling with the NHS, whilst UK public healthcare continues to deteriorate.

Let me turn to to an open question:

Rather than increasing the

OOPS!

OOPS! (Photo credit: Byzantine_K)

NHS bureaucracy, surely the UK Government would be wiser to complete a strategic review of the UK’s public healthcare, compared to best practice in countries like Germany, France and Italy?

Any thoughts?

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta