Opinion – Advantage Britain: ruling the education world post-Brexit | THE Comment -The Times Higher Education

SWOT analysis diagram in English language. Fra...

SWOT analysis diagram in English language. Français : Matrice SWOT en anglais. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

English: Figure 10: SWOT-Analysis of the organ...

English: Figure 10: SWOT-Analysis of the organic business idea. Belongs to The Organic Business Guide. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Swot analysis

Swot analysis (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I take strong exception to this Times Education article by Jamie Martin, an independent education consultant and formerly special adviser to Michael Gove when he was the UK’s secretary of state for education. Jamie Martin argues that post-Brexit, with the right strategies, becoming the leading country for scholarship and science is within the UK’s grasp.

Source: Advantage Britain: ruling the education world post-Brexit | THE Comment

The article is pitched at a UK niche strategy in education. It cites the outstanding reputation of Britain’s top universities and believes that this is generalizable with more money thrown at it.

As an expert in delivering strategic change, I sense the article would have appealed to Michael Gove in his post-truth Brexit campaigning. It’s full of motherhood statements and extremely light on evidence. Strategic analysis starts with competitive benchmarking and SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats). The hard evidence, using international benchmark studies by international organizations like OECD shows that the UK education sector has been on the slide for years.

Like in the US and France, the UK has a handful of world-class universities but public education has deep flaws. Indeed recently the UK and the US were bottom in a OECD league table of literacy and numeracy – this is simply disgraceful.

A large part of the problem in both the US and the UK concerns teachers who are heavily unionized, often strongly left-wing, with increasing leanings towards to far-left for whom the end justifies the means.  The reality is that the bureaucratic education sector does not have enough competition. Also teachers unions put their own interests ahead of adopting change. If a large Activity Based Costing Study was conducted of the education sector, most of the cost would be in administration and bureaucracy rather than teaching.

Many UK teachers think that they are working hard but they are immune from the pressures of other sectors where professionals soon learn that it’s results that count not effort.

For the UK to be a real leader in education, a radical change strategy is required, opening up competition and removing restrictive practices and the unions. Non-performing teachers must be kicked out and replaced by competitors from around the world, especially Europe. For too long, teaching has been a soft option for the lazy and risk averse.

In a post-Brexit world, especially a hard-Brexit, there will be far less growth to fund experimental programs in the education sector. If the government is serious about an education strategy, it must be ready to cut out the weak and non-performing parts of the system.

Sadly, I fear that many in the education sector will read Jamie Martin’s article and believe that this blue sky vision represents the truth. Welcome to post-truth politics.

Thoughts?

Opinion – Leadsom is not naive. She aimed her motherhood pitch at her voters | Jane Merrick | Politics | The Guardian

Peter Moore, Town Crier to the Mayor of London...

Peter Moore, Town Crier to the Mayor of London and The Greater London Authority. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

In this insightful article from the Observer it claims that Theresa May’s challenger has a fresh, insurgent agenda – and she knows her appeal lies with a restless party membership.

Source: Leadsom is not naive. She aimed her motherhood pitch at her voters | Jane Merrick | Politics | The Guardian

With reference to Leadsom’s underhanded comments about motherhood to the Times, the Observer see this as deliberately calculated:

This was not so much a dog whistle but the loud booming voice of a town crier in the shires. Leadsom knows that many Conservative members will see themselves reflected in her: Christian, socially conservative, anti-gay marriage, Eurosceptic.

Under Cameron, the Conservative Central Office has reached out to minorities, especially gays. But Leadsom is openly anti-gay and anti-feminism too. With her Christian, socially conservative views, she’s putting the clock back to the fifties for the Conservatives. As well as pitching to mums, she is reaching out to far-right supporters of UKIP.

For me, Leadsom is peddling post-truth politics – hers is the right wing populism of Le Pen, Trump et al. For both the far-left and far-right, truth and evidence are readily subordinated and the end generally justifies the means. My greatest fear is that Leadsom as prime minister will unleash an evil far-right government.

Let me ask an open question:

Does  Andrea Leadsom’s right-wing populist agenda make her

Conservative Party (UK)

Conservative Party (UK) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

a fascist?

Thoughts?