Opinion – Yazidi Islamic – State Kidnapping Victim Decribes Nine Days of Horror – SPIEGEL ONLINE – John Gelmini

English: President Barack Obama delivers a pol...

English: President Barack Obama delivers a policy address on events in the Middle East and North Africa at the State Department. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Greater Middle East

Greater Middle East (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Dr Alf speaks of it being time to “revisit President Obama’s Middle East strategy”.

Sadly, one cannot revisit something which didn’t exist in the first place, even assuming that the patrician, useless and out of his depth, President Obama, was capable of dreaming one up in the first instance.

The so called “strategy” for the Middle East is based on an idea called “The Arc of Crisis”, which is a mental construct of the proponents of the Project For a New American Century and the Bilderberg Group.

It is a doctrine which calls for a Balkanised and exploitable Middle East riven by war, internecine strife and presenting opportunities to destabilize troublesome regimes, and sell arms whilst plundering oil wealth.

The problem is that countries like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar (all allegedly funders of ISIS), would like to create a Global Caliphate, which is why they are funding the Wahibi sect and a massive program of mosque building all over the world but particularly in the UK, Europe, the USA, Sri Lanka and the Far East.

Within these mosques and in Muslim schools, the terrorists of tomorrow are being radicalized, brainwashed and transformed into the next group of ISIS, Korosan and lookalike beheaders, rapists, crucifiers and torturers.

As each group expands, like inkspots, they merge until they become progressively larger until their desired Endgame which is nothing less than a Global Caliphate.

The Bilderbergers and their fellow travelers in the march towards a New World Order, have been copied and with their higher birthrate Muslims will outnumber Westerners and some host populations within a matter of 30 years or less.

Those who preach “multiculturalism ” in the UK and Europe are guilty of falling into this trap.

The line must be drawn in the sand now. President Obama must be replaced sooner rather than later and our vacuous leaders need to take firm action to deal with the threat before people are forced to take matters into their own hands as the Dutch motorcycle gangs are already beginning to do by coming to the aid of the Kurds.

John Gelmini

Cameron Leads Britain Into War Again | Global Research

The unbalanced scales showing a right-wing POV...

The unbalanced scales showing a right-wing POV creeping in. Contrast with Image:Unbalanced_scales-too-far-left.png, which shows a left-wing POV creeping in. For a template on conspiracy theory POVs I’m working on creating. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The unbalanced scales showing a left-wing POV ...

The unbalanced scales showing a left-wing POV creeping in. Contrast with Image:Unbalanced_scales-too-far-right.png, which shows a right-wing POV creeping in. For a template on conspiracy theory POVs I’m working on creating. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

This is an example of the distorted inaccurate reporting of the far-left of the political spectrum. It’s worth a read, just to be able to identify truly biased writing. Check it out!

via Cameron Leads Britain Into War Again | Global Research.

When I first saw the reference to Global Research I thought that this might be a respectable think-tank. Let me share what Rational-Wiki shared about Global Research:

Despite presenting itself as a source of scholarly analysis, Globalresearch mostly consists of polemics many of which accept (and use) conspiracy theories,pseudoscience and propaganda. The prevalent conspiracist strand relates to global power-elites (primarily governments and corporations) and their New World Order. Specific featured conspiracy theories include those addressing 9/11,vaccines,genetic modification,Zionism,HAARP,global warming,Bosniangenocidedenialism and David Kelly.

Globalresearch contributors are happy to source information from anyone who seems vaguely aligned with their ideology; during the 2011 Libyancivil war the site was an apologist for Muammar al-Gaddafi, reproducing his propaganda and painting him as a paragon of a modern leader. In the 2014 Ukrainian crisis the site is taking the standard “anti-globalisation” stance against the Western side and falling into the ranks of imperial Russian propaganda instead.

It’s no surprise then that the site has long become a magnet for radicals, fringe figures and whacko elements from the left in general.

Returning to the story, David Cameron does not deserve this sort of distorted reporting.

My politics are clearly defined (open link for more information). In particular, I completely reject the growing influence of both the far-left and the far-right.

As editor of this blog, I believe in understanding all side of the argument. But most of all, will also question to see the quality of the evidence.