The great green con no. 1: The hard proof that finally shows global warming forecasts that are costing you billions were WRONG all along | Mail Online

English: Graphic illustrating the percentages ...

English: Graphic illustrating the percentages of public opinions on the likelihood of some scientists falsifying global warming research. Based on Rasmussen polling of 1,000 American adults conducted July 29-30, 2011. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

For the third blog on global warming, here is an important MailOnline article, published in May 2013. It’s AN IMPORTANT READ. Check it out!

via The great green con no. 1: The hard proof that finally shows global warming forecasts that are costing you billions were WRONG all along | Mail Online.

This supplements the earlier blogs. Open the links to see the first and second articles.

Of course, there is a lot of money supporting the anti-global warming cause. This is a major political consideration because big business and its sponsors would likely lose billions if protecting the environment for future generations became a priority policy.

Any thoughts?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leading Expert Modeler Tells Why Climate Models Hardly Better Than Hocus Pocus: “Welcome To Wonderland”!

Cover of "The Global Warming Debate"

Cover of The Global Warming Debate

 

This is the second blog this morning focusing on the balanced reporting of the scientific evidence on the global warming debate. Check it out!

 

via Leading Expert Modeler Tells Why Climate Models Hardly Better Than Hocus Pocus: “Welcome To Wonderland”!.

 

See also the reblog of the MailOnline article.

 

Any thoughts?

 

 

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta