We cannot afford to miss out on shale gas – David Cameron – Telegraph

This is a MUST READ article from UK Prime Minister, David Cameron, and published in the Telegraph.

via We cannot afford to miss out on shale gas – David Cameron – Telegraph.

Personally, I do not think that David Cameron has accurately reflected the damage to the environment that would be caused by extensive fracking in some of the UK’s most beautiful countryside; also the risks have been understated.

I am also suspicious of the role of the Local Authorities here. If Local Authorities receive £100,000 for the granting of a license for exploration, surely they are going to be less stringent in protecting environmental issues?

Finally, when the fracking companies go into production, they are going to pay the Local Authorities a share of the revenues for the benefit of the community. I would argue that the compensation should be paid to property owners whose views are blighted by the fracking sites. To reinforce this argument, I refer you to a series of blogs from Pit, a German expat living in Southern Texas, who described in detail what happened when they set up a fracking site across the road from his house. in Texas.

Once again, there does not appear to have been proper consultation from David Cameron’s Government and now we are getting spin to justify a decision already made.

Let me ask two open questions:

  1. Should David Cameron take the fracking decision to the UK people with a referendum?
  2. Why haven’t European countries like Germany and France embraced fracking?
Against fracking 01

Against fracking 01 (Photo credit: Bosc d’Anjou)

Any thoughts?…………

Enhanced by Zemanta

A Trans Atlantic Perspective in Support of UK Fracking

Against fracking 01

Against fracking 01 (Photo credit: Bosc d’Anjou)

Further to my reblogging of the article entitled “Fracking ‘biggest threat to countryside after housing’, says ex-minister, published in the Telegraph, I received two very thoughtful responses in support of fracking.

The first response was from Pit, a German expat living in Southern Texas who has a fracking site adjacement to his house.

The second response is from John Gelmini.

I am publishing both responses below although for me the UK Government still needs to answer many important questions on fracking.

Pit – A German Exapat Living in Texas – opposite a facking site  

From what I see around here in the middle of the Eagle Ford Shale in southern Texas, fracking certainly does ruin the countryside. In that regard Cuadrilla’s boss, Francis Egan, is definitely not telling the truth. At several times in the last two years I’ve been able to see 7 to 8 drilling-rigs just from the front porch of our house, with one directly across the highway from our place. And whereas those rigs are gone after a few weeks, the pads, sometimes with tanks, sometimes with pipelines and machinery, sometimes with pumping-jacks, remain, and they are a blot on the landscape. Bearing in mind that those pads of necessity are close to each other [horizontally the drilling can reach for 5,000 ft at most], that means a lot of blotches in the end. I readily admit that drilling and fracking have become safer over the years, but still – as with any other technology – Murphy’s law applies and what can go wrong will go wrong sooner or later.

All that notwithstanding, I know that – may it be now or may it be later – getting oil and gas by fracking will just be a necessity, and therefore I personally am not opposed to that technology. We simply need it.

As to the protesters: I’d really like to know if they ever think of where the energy they use comes from.

Best regards from southern Texas,
Pit

John Gelmini

This is more grandstanding from a man who has resigned from his post and is attempting to curry favour with “Middle England” by piggybacking on the anti-fracking demonstrations in Balcombe, West Sussex.

Nick Herbert knows full well that with 4% extra capacity in the Grid, just one hard winter will be enough to create blackouts, an inability to refuel vehicles and economic chaos.

We had harsh winters with Arctic conditions in 1981, 1992, 2001, 2002, 2009, 2010 and 2011. The same happened in 2012 and this year, when the snow did not clear until May.This prompted the Met Office to have an extraordinary general meeting in Exeter and cite a repetition of a weather cycle from a long time ago as the cause.After the meeting the press cited Climate Change as the cause.

Conservation, Green Energy, OSPREY, Wave technology and hot rocks will not be enough, nor will extending the lives of existing power stations earmarked for closure.

Nuclear power can close the gap but not until 15 years from now, which leaves fracking as the way forward.

Unrepresentative Protesters and Nimbies on the March
—————————————————————————-
An examination of the Wikipedia entry for Balcombe village shows that the total population is 1,765 people yet even the most optimistic and generous estimates show that the number of protesters ,photographed and appearing in newspapers such as the Daily Telegraph,the Guardian and the Daily Express was less than 300 with a maximum of up to 50 protesters blocking the the route to the Caudrilla site.
By my arithmetic this means that 16% of the population protested whilst the vast majority of 84% did not protest but either stayed at home or went about their day to day business.

A look at the dress and backgrounds of these people almost suggests that Johnnie Boden the trendy clothing designer kitted them all out ready for the sort of summer festival David Cameron attends at Cornbury.

These are people with money, time on their hands and little to do other than waste police time.

In short, a vociferous minority of people no more representative of their village than the fictional detective Chief Inspector Barnaby of Corston CID was representative of Midsummer, the fictional English village populated only by English people.

Explaining the Energy Situation We Face
——————————————————-
The Government has been derelict in its duty to make the case for fracking and to explain just how perilous our energy supply is.

It has failed to explain the risks of not acting,it has failed to plan for the future and because of what it has said in the past about global warming it is finding it difficult to be credible about what measures to take over harsh winters.

It must do so now.

Enhanced by Zemanta